بررسی رویکردهای متعارض به حاکمیت سایبری ( مطالعه موردی حاکمیت سایبری روسیه و آمریکا)

فهرست منابع و مآخذ

• Asmolov, G., & Kolozaridi, P. (2021). Run Runet runaway: The transformation of the Russian Internet as a cultural-historical object. The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies, 277.
• Barbesino, K. (2019)."Treatment and Evolution of Digital Rights: A Comparative Analysis of China, Russia, the United States, and Germany", Rollins College Honors Program Theses. https://scholarship.rollins.edu/honors/97
• Benton, S. (2022), Defend Forward, A Proactive Model for Cyber Deterrence, Cyber defenders council, Available at: https://www.cybereason.com/hubfs/dam/collateral/ebooks/Defend_Forward_Proactive_Model_Cyber_Deterrence_ebook.pdf
• Budnitsky, S. (2020). Russia’s great power imaginary and pursuit of digital multipolarity. Budnitsky, S. (2020). Russia’s great power imaginary and pursuit of digital multipolarity. Internet Policy Review, 9(3).
• Budnitsky, S. (2022). A Relational Approach to Digital Sovereignty: e-Estonia Between Russia and the West. International Journal of Communication, 16, 22.
• Carr, M. (2013). Internet freedom, human rights and power. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 67(5), 6-18.‏
• Chislova, O., & Sokolova, M. (2021). Cybersecurity in Russia. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 2(2), 245-251.
• Claessen, E. (2020). “Reshaping the internet–the impact of the securitisation of internet infrastructure on approaches to internet governance: the case of Russia and the EU”. Journal of Cyber Policy. 5(1), 140-157.
• Creemers, R. (2020). China’s conception of cyber sovereignty. Governing cyberspace: Behavior, power and diplomacy, 107-145.
• Davydov, S. (Ed.). (2020). Internet in Russia. A Study of the Runet and Its Impact on Social Life. Springer. Cham
• Deyermond, R. (2016). The uses of sovereignty in twenty-first century Russian foreign policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(6), 957-984.
• Diesen, G. (2021). Russian conservatism: Managing change under permanent revolution. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Duggal, P. (2019). Data Localization. Data analysis. Available at: https://datacatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Data-Localization-Pavan-Duggal.pdf
• Dutton, W. H. (2015). Multistakeholder internet governance? World Development Report 2016 Digital Dividends,
• Epifanova, A., & Dietrich, P. (2022). Russia's Quest for Digital Sovereignty: Ambitions, Realities, and Its Place in the World. (DGAP Analysis, 1). Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V. https:// nbn-resolving.org/urn: nbn: de: 0168-ssoar-77994-6.
• Fang, B. (2018). Cyberspace Sovereignty Reflections on building a community of common future in cyberspace. Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
• Finkel, E., & Brudny, Y. M. (2012). Russia and the colour revolutions. Democratization, 19(1), 15–36.
• Fukuyama, F. (2022). Liberalism and its discontents. Profile Books.
• Gao, X. (2022). An attractive alternative? China’s approach to cyber governance and its implications for the Western model. The International Spectator, 1-16.
• Grabowski, M. (2018). Should the US Reclaim Control of the Internet: Evaluating ICANN's Administrative Oversight Since the 2016 Handover?  L. Rev. Bulletin, 1.
• Haass, R. (2004), Sovereignty, Foreign policy, Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/sovereignty
• Harnisch, S., & Zettl-Schabath, K. (2022). Secrecy and Norm Emergence in Cyber-Space. The US, China and Russia Interaction and the Governance of Cyber-Espionage. Democracy and Security, 1-29.
• Hill, R. (2015). The true stakes of internet governance. State of Power. An annual anthology on global power and resistance. The Transnational Institute. Available at: http://www. tni. Org/sites/www. Tni. Org/files/download/03_tni_state-of-power-2015_the_true_ stakes of internet governance. pdf.
• Huang, ZH, Cai, C. Dai.L, Ping.L, Li. Y, (2021), Sovereignty in Cyberspace: Theory and Practice. Available at: https://www.wicwuzhen.cn/web21/information/Release/202109/t20210928_23158332.shtml
• Jensen, E. T. (2015). Cyber sovereignty: The way ahead. Tex. Int'l LJ, 50, 275.
• Kosseff, J. (2019, May). The Contours of ‘Defend Forward’Under International Law. In 2019 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon) (Vol. 900, pp. 1-13). IEEE.
• Kozdra, M. (2018). “The Boundaries of Russian Identity Analysis of the Concept of Russkiy Mir in Contemporary Russian Online Media”. Lingua Cultura, Vol.12, No.1, pp.61-66.‏
• Krasner, S. D. (1999). In Sovereignty. Princeton University Press.
• Kreitem, H., Ragnedda, M. and Muschert, G. W. (2020). “Digital inequalities in European post-Soviet states”. In Societies and political orders in transition, (pp. 3–15). S. Davydov (Ed.), Springer,
• Kurbalija, J. (2016 B). “Digital Connectivity. From Harmonising Cyberpolicies to Promoting Twiplomacy: How Diplomacy Can Strengthen Asia-Europe’s Digital Connectivity”. ASEF Outlook Report 2016/2017.
• Lahmann, H. (2021). On the Politics and Ideologies of the Sovereignty Discourse in Cyberspace. Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L., 32, 61.
• Lewis, D. G. (2020). Russia's New Authoritarianism: Putin and the Politics of Order. Edinburgh University Press.
• Litvinenko, A. (2021). Re-Defining Borders Online: Russia’s Strategic Narrative on Internet Sovereignty. Media and Communication, 9(4), 5-15.
• Makarychev, A. (2011). Russia in a multipolar world: Role identities and “cognitive maps”. Revista CIDOB d’afers internationals, 96(12), 1-19.
• Masoumifar, A. (2022). Cyberspace Sovereignty: Is Territorializing Cyberspace Opposed to Having a Globally Compatible Internet? Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 6(1), 1-20.
• McGowan, J. (2007). American liberalism: An interpretation for our time. Univ of North Carolina Press.
• Nikkarila, J. P., & Ristolainen, M. (2017, May). “‘RuNet 2020’-Deploying traditional elements of combat power in cyberspace?” In Game Changer: Structural transformation of cyberspace. Kukkola, J., Ristolainen, M., & Nikkarila, J. P. (E.d). (pp. 27-50). Finnish Defence Research Agency.
• Palladino, N., & Santaniello, M. (2021). Introduction: The IANA Transition and Internet Multistakeholder Governance. In Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance(pp. 1-20). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Powers, S. M., & Jablonski, M. (2015). The real cyber war: The political economy of internet freedom. University of Illinois Press.
• Putin, V.(2022(, Russian President Says the Unipolar World Has Come to an End, Available at: https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Russian-President-Says-the-Unipolar-World-Has-Come-to-an-End-20220617-0018.html
• Robinson, P. (2019). Russian Conservatism. Northern Illinois University Press.
• Russia 1993 constitution, Available at: http://www.constitution.ru/en/10003000-02.htm.
• Smeets, M. (2020). US cyber strategy of persistent engagement & defend forward: implications for the alliance and intelligence collection. Intelligence and national security, 35(3), 444-453.
• Spinello, R. A. (2020). Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Stadnik, I. (2021). Russia: An independent and sovereign Internet? In Power and Authority in Internet Governance (pp. 147-167). Routledge.
• Statute of Roskomnadzor, (2022), Available at: https://eng.rkn.gov.ru/about/statute_of_roskomnadzor/
• Strickling, L. E., & Hill, J. F. (2017). Multi-stakeholder internet governance: successes and opportunities. Journal of Cyber Policy, 2(3), 296-317.
• Thomson, J. E. (1995). State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research. International Studies Quarterly, 39(2), 213. Doi: 10.2307/2600847.
• US Department of State. (2006, Dec 28). Global Internet Freedom Task Force (GIFT) Strategy: A Blueprint for Action, https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/78340.htm
• Weitzenboeck, E. M. (2014). Hybrid net: the regulatory framework of ICANN and the DNS. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 22(1), 49–73.
• Xue, D., Ramesh, R., Evdokimov, L., Viktorov, A., Jain, A., Wustrow, E., & Ensafi, R. (2021, November). Throttling Twitter: an emerging censorship technique in Russia. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 435-443).
• Yeli, H. (2017). A three-perspective theory of cyber sovereignty. Prism, 7(2), 108-115.
• Zh,L. (2022), A Revisit of the Domain Name System After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine, Congressional Research Service, Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11898
• Аркадьевич, К. (2017), Суверенная Россия, Availableat: http://council.gov.ru/services/discussions/blogs/83371/