Lessons learned from the legal agreements of the Caspian Sea from a geopolitical perspective with emphasis on the political dimension
Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Education
2 Supervisor
3 Advisor
Abstract
The Caspian Sea is a closed sea whose legal regime has not been determined until today. The main problem of the non-establishment of the Caspian legal regime is rooted in its geographical conditions. Convention 2891 left the establishment of the legal regime of the closed seas in the hands of its coastal countries. The lack of consensus on how to determine the boundaries turned the Caspian into one of the critical regions. The special geopolitical conditions after the collapse of the Soviet Union became the basis for territorialization, sphere of influence, and competition between regional powers. It challenged the past agreements and regional cooperation, including the determination of the legal regime, and was able to delay it. . The aim of the current research is to explain the geopolitical lessons of legal studies in the Caspian region The following article seeks to examine the experiences and lessons learned related to the legal agreements of the Caspian Sea, focusing on its political aspects. The dominant approach is qualitative research and its type is qualitative content analysis in terms of its practical purpose and its implementation method. The method of collecting data and information is based on the library method and the opinion of experts in the research field has been used to confirm the themes extracted. The findings of the research indicate the existence of six main areas related to the lessons learned from the legal agreements of the Caspian Sea. The results of the research showed that the lessons learned from the political agreements of the Caspian basin in the six dimensions of maintaining political independence, international treaties, diplomatic relations, political cooperation, demarcation of borders and international legal laws were the themes extracted regarding the agreements.
Keywords
منابع
الف- فارسی
- حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا؛ مجتهدزاده، سپنتا؛ پردشتی، حسن (1398). «تبیین نقش عوامل ژئوپلیتیکی بر استقرار رژیم حقوقی دریای خزر»، فصلنامه بین‌المللی ژئوپلیتیک، 15(1)، 1-22.
- صمدزاده صابر، مجید؛ احمدی‌پور، زهرا؛ حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا (1399). «تکامل و عقلانیت ژئوپلیتیک منطقه خزر: استقرار رژیم حقوقی و الگوی رفتاری تعامل و همگرایی»، فصلنامه مطالعات آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، 111، 85-115.
- ساداتیان، سید جلال (1398). «رژیم حقوقی دریای خزر و امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، فصلنامه امنیت ملی، 9(34)، 311-345.
- ابراهیمی کیاپی، هادی (1398). «ارزیابی رژیم‌های حقوقی و الگوی کنش راهبردی ج.ا.ایران در دریای خزر (منافع ملی، کنترل منطقه‌ای، توزیع سرزمینی و همکاری‌های چندجانبه)»، آموزش علوم دریایی، 6(1)، 99-109.
- رحمانی فضلی، عبدالرضا (1384). «ژئوپلیتیک دریای خزر با تأکید بر رژیم حقوقی آن»، فصلنامه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 4(4)، 47-67.
- نیومن، ویلیام لاورنس (1389). شیوه‌های پژوهش اجتماعی، رویکردهای کمی و کیفی. ترجمه حسن دانایی‌فرد و سید حسین کاظمی، تهران: انتشارات سمت، جلد اول.
ب- انگلیسی
- Braun, V & Clarke, V.(2006). “Using thematic analysis psychology”, Qualititive Reserch in psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2. PP 77-101.
)