The impact of artificial intelligence on the nature of future wars

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Allameh Tabatabai University

2 Allame tabatabaea univrsity

Abstract

From ancient times, technology has played a significant role in shaping the fate of human societies. Over time, and especially after the Industrial Revolution, technology has been regarded as a cornerstone in various fields of life, particularly in military and warfare domains. Advanced technology, in addition to creating deterrence and preventing losses and costs, has been a decisive factor in military victories. In recent years, the penetration of new AI technology into human life has brought significant transformations in many areas, including the military sector and the battlefield. AI, by providing new tools and solutions, has fundamentally altered the key elements of war and warfare. The nature of war is a crucial topic, and the main concern of this research is whether AI will change or preserve it. Therefore, the research question is: What impact does AI and its application in the military field have on the nature of warfare? The research hypothesis is that the nature of warfare will undergo long-term transformation due to AI. The research findings indicate that the components of the nature of war, based on Clausewitz's perspective, violence, chance, and politics are affected by AI, and the application of AI in the military field will intensify warfare. An analytical method has been used in the research, and both internet and library sources have been utilized.

Keywords

References

  • منابع

    الف- انگلیسی

    • Ahmed, N. U. (2022). “Integrating machine learning in military intelligence process: study of futuristic approaches towards human-machine collaboration”, NDC e-journal, 2(1), pp. 59-89.
    • Ajil, A. (2022). “Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances”, European journal of criminology, 19(2), pp. 304-321.
    • Aron, R. (2022). Clausewitz: Philosopher of war, Routledge.
    • Basak, S., Agrawal, H., Jena, S., Gite, S., Bachute, M., Pradhan, B., & Assiri, M. (2023). “Challenges and Limitations in Speech Recognition Technology: A Critical Review of Speech Signal Processing Algorithms, Tools and Systems”, CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 135(2).
    • Berlinger, J. (2023). “A ‘Pearl Harbor’ moment: Why didn’t Israel’s sophisticated border security stop Saturday’s attack?”, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/07/middleeast/israel-gaza-border-security-intl/index.html.
    • Bjola, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Diplomatic Crisis Management: Addressing the “Fog of War” Problem, Valentin Naumescu Raluca Moldovan, 25.
    • Bollmann, A. T., & Sjøgren, S. (2023). Rethinking Clausewitz’s Chameleon:https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781805390244-005/pdf?licenseType=restricted.
    • Bousquet, A. J. (2022). The scientific way of warfare: Order and chaos on the battlefields of modernity, Oxford University Press.
    • Charles, V., Rana, N. P., & Carter, L. (2022). “Artificial Intelligence for data-driven decision-making and governance in public affairs”, Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), pp. 101-742.
    • Darıcılı, A. B. (2020). “The impact of artificial intelligence management upon international security”, Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(37), pp. 49-72.
    • Enemark, C. (2023). Moralities of Drone Violence, Edinburgh University Press.
    • Eyina, N. N., Ann, D., & Osazuwa, J. A. (2021). Conceptualisation of War: Clausewitzian and Anti-Clausewitzian Perspectives.
    • Francisco, M. (2023). “Artificial intelligence for environmental security: national, international, human and ecological perspectives”, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 61, pp. 101-250.
    • Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2022). “Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation”, Information Systems Research, 33(2), pp. 678-696.
    • Gardner, N. (2021). “Clausewitzian friction and autonomous weapon systems”, Comparative Strategy, 40(1), pp. 86-98.
    • González, R. J. (2022). War virtually: The Quest to automate conflict, militarize data, and predict the future, Univ of California Press.
    • Han, S., Kelly, E., Nikou, S., & Svee, E. O. (2022). “Aligning artificial intelligence with human values: reflections from a phenomenological perspective”, AI & SOCIETY, pp. 1-13.
    • Hoffman, W. & Kim, H. M. K. (2023). Reducing the Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Military Decision Advantage, Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
    • Horowitz, M. C., Allen, G. C., Kania, E. B., & Scharre, P. (2022). Strategic competition in an era of artificial intelligence, Center for a New American Security.
    • Horowitz, M. C., Allen, G. C., Saravalle, E., Cho, A., Frederick, K., & Scharre, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and international security, Center for a New American Security..
    • Huelss, H. (2024). “Transcending the fog of war? US military ‘AI’, vision, and the emergent post-scopic regime”, European Journal of International Security, pp. 1-21.
    • Human Rights (2024). Russia-Ukraine War:  https://www.hrw.org/tag/russia-ukraine-war.
    • Hunter, C., & Bowen, B. E. (2024). “We’ll never have a model of an AI major-general: Artificial Intelligence, command decisions, and kitsch visions of war”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(1), pp. 116-146.
    • Jensen, B. M., Whyte, C., & Cuomo, S. (2020). “Algorithms at war: the promise, peril, and limits of artificial intelligence”, International Studies Review, 22(3), pp. 526-550.
    • Kania, E. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in China's revolution in military affairs. In Defence Innovation and the 4th Industrial Revolution, Routledge.
    • Kelly, P. (2022). Clausewitz: the professionalisation of war.
    • Lu, Z., Wang, D., & Yin, M. (2024). “Does more advice help? the effects of second opinions in AI-assisted decision making”, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), pp. 1-31.
    • Mallick, P. K. (2024). “Artificial intelligence, national security and the future of warfare”, In Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and the Future of Warfare , Routledge India, pp. 30-70.
    • Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. J. (2024). “Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research”, Nature, 627(8002), pp.49-58.
    • Pacholska, M. (2023). “Military Artificial Intelligence and the Principle of Distinction: A State Responsibility Perspective”, Israel Law Review, 56(1), pp. 3-23.
    • Rickli, J. M., & Mantellassi, F. (2023). “Artificial intelligence in warfare: military uses of AI and their international security implications”, In The AI wave in defence innovation, Routledge, pp. 12-36.
    • Seliktar, O. (2024). “The Failure to Predict the Hamas Attack: Insights from Artificial Intelligence”, Orbis, 68(2), pp. 259-275.
    • Shapiro, M. J. (2005). “The fog of war”, Security Dialogue, 36(2), pp. 233-246.
    • Souchon, L. (2020). “Strategy, war, and the relevance of Carl von Clausewitz”, Military Strategy Magazine, pp. 33-37.
    • Waldman, T. (2009). War, Clausewitz, and the Trinity, Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick.
    • Waldman, T. (2012). “Clausewitz and the Study of War”, Defence Studies, 12(3), pp. 345-374.
    • Waldman, T. (2016). War, Clausewitz and the trinity, Routledge.
    • Watts, B. D. (2004). Clausewitzian friction and future war, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, No. 68.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics