Explaining the role model of e-government in reducing anti-productive behaviors in universities

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Mamqan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Imam Ali Officer University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Prof., Department of Public Administration, Osveh Institute of Higher Education, Tabriz,Iran

4 Master's degree, Intensive Care Nursing Department, Islamic Republic of Iran Army University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to explain the role model of e-government in reducing counterproductive behaviors in universities, which is an applied research in terms of its purpose and a mixed approach based on the nature of the data. In the qualitative part, the Delphi method was used, in which the opinions of experts and experts from Islamic Azad University professors were used with the snowball sampling method. In the qualitative part, first, relying on the research literature in the field of counterproductive behaviors and the role of e-government in reducing them in universities, as well as the opinions of experts and experts collected through interviews, a set of indicators related to the counterproductive behaviors of employees were identified and collected. In the next step, using a questionnaire and the Delphi technique, the variables of the aforementioned model were identified and screened in two rounds. Then, using the opinions of experts and relying on the research literature, the proposed research model was presented. In the quantitative part, the statistical population for testing the model is 107 employees of Islamic Azad University. In the data analysis section, the partial least squares technique was used in the Smart PLS software to measure the validity and reliability of the model (for the reliability test, the combined, convergent, and Cronbach's alpha reliability tests were used, and for the validity test, the diagnostic and construct validity tools (confirmatory factor analysis) were used), and to fit the proposed model and determine the priority of their effectiveness, and finally, practical suggestions were presented.

Keywords

References

  • الف- فارسی

    • اداره امور توسعه دولت الکترونیک (1396) خدمات دستگاههای اجرایی از منظر دولت الکترونیک به اهتمام: سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور معاونت نوسازی اداری، اداره امور توسعه دولت الکترونیک. تهران: سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور.
    • بارانی، صمد، فرهادی، علی و عسگری، ناصر. (1401). شناسایی عوامل موثر بر اجتناب از رفتارهای ضد بهره‌وری در سازمان‌های دفاعی. فصلنامه مدیریت نظامی، 22(88)، 145-168.
    • خرمی، مهناز، (1397). نقش میانجی­گری حمایت سازمانی درک شده در ارتباط بین رویه­های تقویت عملکرد شغلی و رفتار ضد بهره­وری در کارکنان شرکت مدیریت تولید برق گیلان، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندر انزلی.
    • دانایی­فرد، حسن، (1390)، چالشهای مدیریت دولتی در ایران، سمت، چاپ چهارم، تهران.
    • قلی­پور، آرین؛ چهرازی، سامان، پیران نژاد، علی. (1394) بررسی تأثیر رهبری خدمتگزار بر رفتارهای ضد بهره­وری کارکنان. مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، (4)2, ص 99-118.
    • کول کویت و همکاران، جیسون­ای (‌1390)‌، مدیریت رفتار سازمانی: بهبود عملکرد و تعهد در سازمان، فیضی و همکاران، اردبیل، انتشارات محقق اردبیلی، چاپ اول.
    • مهدی­زاده، رستم، مهدی و فزونی، مریم و پور طیبی، محمود، (1399)، سطوح روابط عمومی الکترونیک در استقرار اثربخش راهبردی دولت الکترونیک، اولین کنفرانس علمی پژوهشی مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، تهران.
    • میرزایی، وحید، و محمدی، حامد. (1400). بررسی رابطه بین حمایت سازمانی ادراک شده و رفتار ضد بهره وری کارکنان با نقش میانجی بدبینی سازمانی. پژوهش­های روان شناختی در مدیریت، 7(2 )، 9-41.
    • نوروزی فرد، آرش و پرورش، فرید، (1400)، استقرار دولت الکترونیک در ایران، دهمین کنفرانس بین المللی نوآوری در علوم مهندسی، تفلیس-گرجستان.

    ب- انگلیسی

    • Bellora-Bienengräber, L., Radtke, R. R., & Widener, S. K. (2022). Counterproductive Work Behaviors and Work Climate: The Role of an Ethically Focused Management Control System and Peers’ Self-Focused Behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 96, [101275]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101275.
    • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 291-309.
    • Permata, R. K., & Soeling, P. D. (2022). Overcoming Counterproductive Work Behavior with Organizational Justice and a Job Satisfaction Approach. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 8294-8306.
    • Palmer, J. C., Komarraju, M., Carter, M. Z., & Karau, S. J. (2017). Angel on one shoulder: Can perceived organizational support moderate the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and counterproductive work behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 31 -37.
    • Mackey, J. D., McAllister, C. P., Maher, L. P., & Wang, G. (2018). Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta‐analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Personnel Psychology,72(1), 3-47.
    • Tolga, B. A. L. (2020). The Role of Organizational Cynicism as a Mediator in the RelationshipBetween Perceived Organizational Support and Counter Productive Work Behavior for public Employees. SGD-Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi 510(1),145-164.
    • Cole K. colleagues, Jason A. (2016), Managing organizational behavior: improving performance and commitment in the organization, Faizi and colleagues, Ardabil, Mohaghegh Ardabili Publications, first edition.
    • Carpenter, N. C., Whitman, D. S., & Amrhein, R. (2021). Unit-level counterproductive work behavior (CWB): A conceptual review and quantitative summary. Journal of management, 47(6), 1498-1527.
    • Chen, H, Orlando, Richard, O. Dorian B, David L, Ford, J.R. (2020), Work engagement, emotional exhaustion, and counterproductive work Behavior, Journal of Business Research 114, 30–41.
    • Gürlek, M, (2021), Workplace ostracism, Syrian migrant workers’ counterproductive work behaviors, and acculturation: Evidence from Turkey, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 46, 336–346.
    • Khan, A., Krishnan, S. (2019). “Conceptualizing the impact of corruption in national institutions and national stakeholder service systems on e-government maturity”, International Journal of Information Management, 46 (1), 23-36.
    • Kim, H.J. Pan, G., Pan, S. L. (2007), “Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: a case study on e-government in South Korea”, Government Information Quarterly, 24 (2) 338-352.
    • Verkijika, S., De Wet, L. (2018). “A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa”, International Journal of Information Management, 39 (1), 20-29.
    • Yang, J. H., Lin, C. C., Fang, S. C., & Huang, C. Y. (2019). An uncertainty management theory on the effects of abusive supervision. Management Decision, Vol. 57 No. 11, pp. 3079-3095
    • Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L. Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474-2497.
Quarterly Journal of Environmental Studies Strategic of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 33
February 2026
Pages 135-166

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics