تأثیر هوش مصنوعی بر ماهیت جنگ های آینده

منابع

الف- انگلیسی

• Ahmed, N. U. (2022). “Integrating machine learning in military intelligence process: study of futuristic approaches towards human-machine collaboration”, NDC e-journal, 2(1), pp. 59-89.
• Ajil, A. (2022). “Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances”, European journal of criminology, 19(2), pp. 304-321.
• Aron, R. (2022). Clausewitz: Philosopher of war, Routledge.
• Basak, S., Agrawal, H., Jena, S., Gite, S., Bachute, M., Pradhan, B., & Assiri, M. (2023). “Challenges and Limitations in Speech Recognition Technology: A Critical Review of Speech Signal Processing Algorithms, Tools and Systems”, CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 135(2).
• Berlinger, J. (2023). “A ‘Pearl Harbor’ moment: Why didn’t Israel’s sophisticated border security stop Saturday’s attack?”, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/07/middleeast/israel-gaza-border-security-intl/index.html.
• Bjola, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Diplomatic Crisis Management: Addressing the “Fog of War” Problem, Valentin Naumescu Raluca Moldovan, 25.
• Bollmann, A. T., & Sjøgren, S. (2023). Rethinking Clausewitz’s Chameleon:https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781805390244-005/pdf?licenseType=restricted.
• Bousquet, A. J. (2022). The scientific way of warfare: Order and chaos on the battlefields of modernity, Oxford University Press.
• Charles, V., Rana, N. P., & Carter, L. (2022). “Artificial Intelligence for data-driven decision-making and governance in public affairs”, Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), pp. 101-742.
• Darıcılı, A. B. (2020). “The impact of artificial intelligence management upon international security”, Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(37), pp. 49-72.
• Enemark, C. (2023). Moralities of Drone Violence, Edinburgh University Press.
• Eyina, N. N., Ann, D., & Osazuwa, J. A. (2021). Conceptualisation of War: Clausewitzian and Anti-Clausewitzian Perspectives.
• Francisco, M. (2023). “Artificial intelligence for environmental security: national, international, human and ecological perspectives”, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 61, pp. 101-250.
• Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2022). “Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation”, Information Systems Research, 33(2), pp. 678-696.
• Gardner, N. (2021). “Clausewitzian friction and autonomous weapon systems”, Comparative Strategy, 40(1), pp. 86-98.
• González, R. J. (2022). War virtually: The Quest to automate conflict, militarize data, and predict the future, Univ of California Press.
• Han, S., Kelly, E., Nikou, S., & Svee, E. O. (2022). “Aligning artificial intelligence with human values: reflections from a phenomenological perspective”, AI & SOCIETY, pp. 1-13.
• Hoffman, W. & Kim, H. M. K. (2023). Reducing the Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Military Decision Advantage, Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
• Horowitz, M. C., Allen, G. C., Kania, E. B., & Scharre, P. (2022). Strategic competition in an era of artificial intelligence, Center for a New American Security.
• Horowitz, M. C., Allen, G. C., Saravalle, E., Cho, A., Frederick, K., & Scharre, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and international security, Center for a New American Security..
• Huelss, H. (2024). “Transcending the fog of war? US military ‘AI’, vision, and the emergent post-scopic regime”, European Journal of International Security, pp. 1-21.
• Human Rights (2024). Russia-Ukraine War:  https://www.hrw.org/tag/russia-ukraine-war.
• Hunter, C., & Bowen, B. E. (2024). “We’ll never have a model of an AI major-general: Artificial Intelligence, command decisions, and kitsch visions of war”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(1), pp. 116-146.
• Jensen, B. M., Whyte, C., & Cuomo, S. (2020). “Algorithms at war: the promise, peril, and limits of artificial intelligence”, International Studies Review, 22(3), pp. 526-550.
• Kania, E. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in China's revolution in military affairs. In Defence Innovation and the 4th Industrial Revolution, Routledge.
• Kelly, P. (2022). Clausewitz: the professionalisation of war.
• Lu, Z., Wang, D., & Yin, M. (2024). “Does more advice help? the effects of second opinions in AI-assisted decision making”, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), pp. 1-31.
• Mallick, P. K. (2024). “Artificial intelligence, national security and the future of warfare”, In Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and the Future of Warfare , Routledge India, pp. 30-70.
• Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. J. (2024). “Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research”, Nature, 627(8002), pp.49-58.
• Pacholska, M. (2023). “Military Artificial Intelligence and the Principle of Distinction: A State Responsibility Perspective”, Israel Law Review, 56(1), pp. 3-23.
• Rickli, J. M., & Mantellassi, F. (2023). “Artificial intelligence in warfare: military uses of AI and their international security implications”, In The AI wave in defence innovation, Routledge, pp. 12-36.
• Seliktar, O. (2024). “The Failure to Predict the Hamas Attack: Insights from Artificial Intelligence”, Orbis, 68(2), pp. 259-275.
• Shapiro, M. J. (2005). “The fog of war”, Security Dialogue, 36(2), pp. 233-246.
• Souchon, L. (2020). “Strategy, war, and the relevance of Carl von Clausewitz”, Military Strategy Magazine, pp. 33-37.
• Waldman, T. (2009). War, Clausewitz, and the Trinity, Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick.
• Waldman, T. (2012). “Clausewitz and the Study of War”, Defence Studies, 12(3), pp. 345-374.
• Waldman, T. (2016). War, Clausewitz and the trinity, Routledge.
• Watts, B. D. (2004). Clausewitzian friction and future war, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, No. 68.